Shoshone County board questions new pay matrix
WALLACE –– Misunderstanding or misinformation? That was the question Commissioner Dave Dose was trying to get answered on Wednesday morning.
Last week, the Shoshone County Commissioners approved a request from the clerk’s office to transition to a new pay matrix for several departments within the courthouse.
During the previous meeting, Interim Clerk Peggy Whiten said each person would be getting a minimum 1% raise, while others would see higher increases based upon longevity, as part of an effort to bring a more unified pay structure countywide. During their most recent budget cycle, the county earmarked $148,000 for wage increases.
After the October payroll was completed, Dose said investigated the adjusted wages and was startled by the results.
According to a document Dose handed out during Wednesday’s meeting, the range of raises given to employees under the new system was between 1.68% and 19.66%, with an average of 5.25% across the board.
“The promise that I voted on last week was that this was not a new matrix and the only changes we would see was that 1% increase and the longevity increases,” Dose said. “The average raise was 5%, a significant difference.”
Dose said he was concerned by what he has perceived as an omission of information.
“I asked at that meeting several times if we were giving an average 1% wage increase and the answer I got back clearly was that, yes we were,” Dose said. "We were promised that there were no changes other than that. Our goal was to help the folks who didn’t get the raises with the Sheriff’s Department, Public Works, or Solid Waste over the last couple of years. We also recognize the reason we want a wage study is that there are so many disparities, and we wanted to make things more even.”
The representatives from White’s office, including Lori Osterberg and Timmie Hunter, said the raises given were part of their efforts to bring the different departments into a more aligned pay scale, and because of the disparities between the different existing matrices, different departments and employees saw different percentage increases.
Dose countered by asking who made the determinations on which employees got what increases, pointing out that an employee in his office received a near 20% increase due to what was listed as a “supervisor role,” but none of the commissioners had any input prior to the decision being made by the clerk’s office.
According to Dose and Commissioner Jeff Zimmerman, the county plans on re-examining its pay matrices following the completion of a wage study, which means that no matter what decision is made concerning the recent interim matrix, the county will be readjusting its wage scales once it has the information from that study.
Dose requested that the new matrix be repealed so he and his fellow board members could review and potentially determine what course of action could be taken regarding wages.
Zimmerman disagreed with making any immediate changes, instead suggesting the board wait until Commissioner Tracy Casady could join them for further discussion and possible decision.
“My understanding was that there were employees left far behind," he said. "What I would like to do is to know how and why for these different employees, and what was behind these raises before I would go forward.”
Dose did suggest offering a blanket percentage raise to the affected employees. His proposal was the same average number of the raises that were handed out within the interim matrix, at 5%. Reportedly, this would total out to $76,848.52 paid out throughout the year — roughly half of what the county had set aside for wage increases.