U.S.: Negotiate and succeed

In response to Bill McClure’s criticism (Coeur d’Alene Press, Dec. 8) of my article urging America to stop withdrawing from the world’s ongoing affairs. (Dec. 4): On points one, two and four, he substantiates my contention that the U.S. cannot exercise leverage if our country is not a participant in these activities. They may be distasteful as they presently exist, but our absence at any negotiations guarantees they will remain distasteful. We cannot use our formidable power to leverage the issues toward our way if we are not present.

The approach suggested by Mr. McClure is akin to a child who, playing a game of marbles, does not like the present arrangement of marbles within the circle, so he picks up his marbles and withdraws from the game. Petulance in the game of marbles is counter-productive. The same can be said for international diplomacy.

Regarding point three, China’s foreign exchange reserves are higher than those of any nation on Earth. In addition, the U.S. debt to China is $1.11 trillion in U.S. bonds.

Point five: As I said, the NATO members must meet their financial obligations. So, Mr. McClure, let’s withdraw from NATO to persuade those backsliders to get on board. Which member country has the clout to shake up NATO? The United States, but only if it is a member.

Finally, point six: I have no issue with your contention, just an observation: Once in a fight, finish it and don’t abandon a now nearly helpless ally. Fewer countries trust America because of this action.

Other than our disagreements, I appreciate your civil response to my column.

UYLESS BLACK

Coeur d’Alene