BUILDING: Key code questions

It might be a good time to step back and examine the process of building permits and inspections. What is it we really want and how should we achieve that? I think we all want safe buildings, but is the current system the best way to insure that or is there another alternative?

The status quo may be the easiest choice; it’s something we are accustomed to and take for granted, but many are polarized on this issue. Builders rarely challenge inspectors or the process for fear of retaliation on future permits. Others believe the existing process guarantees a safe structure; maybe, maybe not.

There are a lot of variables in the system. The competency of inspectors, consistent application of the codes across jurisdictions, who is responsible in the case of a structural failure, are just some of the variables that come to mind. Why should it take a week or less to get a permit in one jurisdiction and it takes many weeks in another for the same permit?

Should the county make permits voluntary I would challenge lenders, insurance companies and builders to step up to the plate. This would be an opportunity for private enterprise to shine. Doesn’t the lender and the insurance company have the most exposure when it comes to building safety? Aren’t our builders the first line of defense against unsafe buildings? The customer relies on all of them.

Consider a permit and inspection service funded by the lending institutions and insurance companies. They have the most skin in the game and a real reason to protect their capital.

I also believe it to be a great opportunity for the local building group, NIBCA, to provide education and expertise. It would be a great source for qualified inspectors in the future and a place where building education would flourish. I know many members of NIBCA and am confident they have the ability and the desire to build safe structure for our citizens.

COLLIN COLES

Post Falls