Transparency takes a kick to the groin
Thanks, Vito, for keeping the lights off.
Heather, bravo! What with the short days and scarce visits by ol’ Sol, Idahoans’ eyes would’ve been jeopardized by suddenly flipping the brights on elected officials’ personal finances.
North Idahoans Vito Barbieri and Heather Scott were just two of the House State Affairs Committee members who killed a sensible proposal Wednesday to let voters know where candidates’ money is. The assassination occurred despite the fact that the bill was drafted by the committee’s Republican chairman and unanimously endorsed earlier by an impressive legislative panel.
Transparency be damned. Idaho will remain one of just two states — Michigan is the other — that don’t require their elected guys and gals to pull the covers off their personal finances. Every other state does because, presumably, they think there’s some merit in citizens being able to determine where elected officials’ private interests might conflict with the public’s interests.
Silly public.
The only House State Affairs Committee members who voted in favor of simply wanting the bill to be heard were Rep. Tom Loertscher, R-Iona, and Democrats Paulette Jordan of Plummer and Elaine Smith of Pocatello. Thus the bill isn’t just dark; it’s silent because it won’t even be debated.
According to Rep. Loertscher and the legislative panel, all candidates for elective office at the state, legislative, county or city level would have been required to disclose:
- Primary employer and job title;
- All entities they own or serve as an officer;
- Every entity that has paid them $5,000 or more in the past year;
- All the boards on which they serve;
- Their spouse’s name, employer and occupation.
As disappointing as this middle finger to citizens’ right to know is, it should not be surprising. Constituents either agreed that financial disclosure is none of the public’s business or didn’t bother to tell the House State Affairs Committee members why the legislation is important. That’s on all of us out here in the land of the detached.
It’s also not surprising because in this great nation of ours, the inhabitant of the highest elected office can keep his personal finances in the dark. If it’s OK there, it must be OK everywhere.