ART: Petition wrong approach

The article on March 22 entitled “Differences on Epiphany” caught my attention, not because of the controversial artwork, but because a petition has sprung up to have the art removed. I admit to voting for another proposed sculpture with a dragonfly theme. I also admit to being disappointed that the Hayden Arts Commission did not select the public’s choice due to disqualifying factors related to maintenance. The public vote should have been conducted only on art that met maintenance guidelines. For that reason, I applaud Krystal Heisz for wanting to bring attention to the city’s process for selecting art.

The disturbing part about the petition to have the Epiphany sculpture removed has nothing to do with revising policies and procedures. The disturbing part is that people are spending time and effort to remove something mainly because they have different tastes in art. Ironically, this petition opposing funds used to obtain the art will cost the city precious funds if removal is required.

While the sculpture is not my style, it seems odd to try to have it removed simply because it isn’t what someone prefers. I prefer Porsches to Pontiacs, but should I start a petition to have all Pontiacs removed from the roads in Hayden? Let’s petition for constructive causes.

The sculpture represents an active mind, not something sinister or negative, so why make a case for removal? For anyone who argues that art is frivolous, please look at economic growth statistics of cities that support public art.

JASON BALL

Hayden