Pets belong at home - again

In response to previous letters to the editor regarding pets in public places I support their ideas also. I understand many pet owners consider their pet to be an important part of their family. I don’t understand why these people inflict their love of pets on others that may not feel the same.

I too have concerns with people that bring their “family” pets into restaurants, grocery stores, etc. or choose to drive with the animal on their lap. On many occasions I have seen pets in grocery stores, in the arms of their loved one who is touching the fresh vegetables, etc., on their extended leash or in the shopping cart, and

I can’t count the number of times I’ve seen animals on the lap of their beloved driver. I personally don’t care to use the same cart a pet has ridden in for my food or clothing, or purchase food that has been touched by another that is carrying a pet. I witnessed a pet being “smuggled” into a restaurant under the coat of the owner. The dog proceeded to put its paws on the table and walk around the booth-like seat. Had I not already ordered my food I would have left. I will never go to this establishment again.

While driving by Home Depot I witnessed a driver with his dog on his lap. This was a medium-sized dog, the driver had his arms on each side of the dog as he proceeded to try and turn the wheel all with the dog in the way. I had to swerve to the right so I wasn’t hit while he turned the corner. Driving with animals freely moving about in a vehicle is to say the least distracting and dangerous for everyone. Animals should be restrained while in a vehicle just as children are. I would expect police officers to address this since it is a safety issue.

I believe “comfort” and “service” (animal) is being severely abused by many who just don’t want to leave their pet at home. I believe unless they are a true service animal they should not be in public places. It is not a right or entitlement of a pet owner to bring their pet when in a public place.

A handicapped person is required to have a legal registration for their parking placard and if they are using it illegally can be issued a fine. A medical doctor should provide documentation to a person who needs a service or comfort animal because of a “disability.” As stated on the ada.gov website, “A service animal is not a pet. Service animals are allowed legally in public places. Some service animals wear special collars and harnesses. Some are licensed or certified and have identification papers. If the animal doesn’t appear to be a service animal the merchant can ask if the animal is a service animal required because of a disability.”

If the pet owner doesn’t have documentation on their person and the animal doesn’t appear to be a service animal then they should be asked to remove the pet from the public place.

I know many establishments have signs on the doors saying no pets allowed (unless service animal) but it isn’t enforced. Anyone can get a service vest for their pet online. Just because they have a vest on (many don’t) doesn’t mean they are a service animal. For people that are disabled and need a service animal I understand. Shame on any individual taking advantage of the rights of disabled folks and portrays their pet as a service animal. You notice I have made the distinction between pet and service animal.

Like Mr. Peters said some people may be allergic, afraid or disgusted with pets. To ensure ALL customers’ needs are met I hope pet owners keep their pets home, merchants be more diligent on assuring service animals are legitimate and the police insure safety for all drivers by stopping and citing drivers with pets on their laps. Common courtesy is always appreciated.

Punky Rasor is a Rathdrum resident.