Wednesday, September 16, 2026
70.0°F

IMMIGRATION: Debate, but don’t abandon the facts

| March 1, 2026 1:00 AM

A narrative is growing that one political party “cares more about immigrants than American citizens.” It’s a powerful claim — and an understandable fear for many — but doesn’t hold up against policy and evidence.

Americans across the political spectrum agree on core principles: prosecute violent crime, remove dangerous individuals and secure borders. Where disagreement exists is not whether to enforce laws, but how — and how to balance enforcement with economic realities, humanitarian concerns, and constitutional protections.

Claims of undocumented immigrants voting in large numbers have been repeatedly investigated and found to be extremely rare. Our election system already includes eligibility verification and fraud penalties. Debates about voter ID are not about whether identification should exist — it already does — but about if requiring specific citizenship documents unintentionally blocks eligible Americans from participating in a fundamental right.

The devastating fentanyl crisis is real. But federal data shows most fentanyl enters through legal ports of entry, often trafficked by U.S. citizens. That suggests solutions focused on inspection capacity, treatment, and law enforcement coordination — not simply immigration status.

Similarly, fraud, homelessness, veterans’ services, youth healthcare, and public safety are complex challenges that Idaho communities actively work to address. Reducing those issues to claims that one party “doesn’t care” oversimplifies problems deserving serious, good-faith discussion.

We are a country capable of holding two truths at once: we can care about American citizens while also insisting on policies grounded in evidence, fairness, and the rule of law.

Healthy public debate moves beyond broad accusations and toward shared goals — safer communities, accountable government, and systems working for the people they serve.

Disagreement is inevitable. But abandoning nuance doesn’t make problems easier to solve.


TONYA COPPEDGE

Coeur d’Alene