‘CITIZEN VIGILANTE’: Support for “ugly” film’s message

Germany and Britain have banned Uwe Boll’s new film “Citizen Vigilante.” These bans are not because of the movie’s graphic violence, which is profligate. Nor is it banned because it explores the ugliness of human rage, which it certainly does.

“Citizen Vigilante” is being banned because it unflinchingly explores the effects of the contemporary Islamic volkerwanderung of tens of millions into Europe, the most significant event in Europe’s history since 1945. Europeans are now being overwhelmed within their own homelands. 

The immigrants’ incompatible culture has brought rates of violent crime never seen in industrial Europe. Their soaring birthrates threaten to soon make them Europe’s new majority. 

There was no electoral campaign to open European borders to endless waves of unrestricted immigration. Europe’s voters never had the opportunity to thoughtfully consider this. The legal basis for this complete civilizational transformation were crafted in the shadows by bureaucrats, politicians, and financiers. 

Europeans who are awakening to this peril face the Left’s ad hominem smear of racism. Britain’s Reform UK, France’s National Rally, and Germany’s AFD are all being undemocratically suppressed. 

Anger is ugly, especially vigilantism. But, it is a natural response to betrayal by an elite more loyal to their idealism than to the best interests of their own people.

As “Death Wish” once braced audiences with the horrors of out-of-control street crime in the 1970s, “Citizen Vigilante” does so with the inescapable realities of mass migration today. Adults who are serious about considering this matter might find it worthwhile to watch. 

RALPH K. GINORIO

Coeur d’Alene