FREE SPEECH, NOT FEAR: Why dissent strengthens Coeur d’Alene

Brent Regan’s warnings about unrest in Coeur d’Alene should be viewed in the context of his leadership in the Kootenai County Republican Central Committee (KCRCC), an organization that has gained notoriety for its aggressive political tactics. Under Regan’s leadership, the KCRCC has worked to consolidate power by endorsing extreme candidates, purging moderates, and even attempting to take over opposing political parties. His rhetoric, which paints any form of dissent as dangerous, is not about preserving community stability — it’s about maintaining control.

Contrast that with the level-headed approach of Lt. Avriett, who rightly emphasized that law enforcement should focus on upholding the rights of all citizens rather than stifling protests. His guidance reflects an understanding that true public safety isn’t achieved through suppression but through mutual respect between citizens and authorities. Communities thrive when police serve as protectors of rights, not enforcers of ideology.

A community where dissent is stifled becomes one where power goes unchecked. Suppressing opposing voices under the guise of “maintaining order” does not create stability — it breeds resentment and stagnation. Studies have shown that open dialogue and civic engagement lead to more responsive governance, greater community trust, and long-term social cohesion. Coeur d’Alene’s strength lies not in silence but in its ability to host robust discussions, even when they are uncomfortable.

Instead of fearing protests, we should welcome them as proof of an engaged and active citizenry. True order comes not from silencing voices but from ensuring all voices have a place at the table.

AMBER BARBER

Coeur d’Alene