RESPONSE: OBBBA is not a threat
William Scott Irving’s characterization of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) as a pathway to dictatorship is alarmist and misleading. The bill’s provision requiring a bond before enforcing contempt citations against government officials is not an attack on judicial power; it’s a long-standing legal principle grounded in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c). Courts have always had discretion to require security when issuing injunctions; OBBBA reinforces this standard, ensuring that injunctions are not weaponized for political gain.
This provision does not eliminate judicial oversight. Judges retain full authority to issue injunctions and contempt citations; they simply must consider whether the plaintiff is willing to back their claim with financial responsibility, a basic safeguard against frivolous or politically motivated litigation.
Become a Subscriber!
You have read all of your free articles this month. Select a plan below to start your subscription today.
Already a subscriber? Login
