DISSENT: It’s crucial for democracy
In a letter to the editor published on July 17, Suzanne Kearney labeled us, Michelle Lippert, Pat Raffee and Theresa Birkett as “critical curmudgeons.” Initially, we found this amusing, but upon reflection, we saw deeper implications in her accusation. Let’s dissect this label.
Firstly, the adjective “critical.” Michelle taught Logic and Critical Thinking at NIC. In these courses, being a critical thinker was essential. A critical thinker exercises careful judgment and judicious evaluation, which are fundamental to informed decision-making and democratic engagement. Therefore, being “critical” is a virtue, not a vice. We suspect Kearney intended the term pejoratively, implying unwarranted negativity rather than constructive analysis.
Become a Subscriber!
You have read all of your free articles this month. Select a plan below to start your subscription today.
Already a subscriber? Login
