STRs: City plans violate property rights

My husband and I moved to downtown Coeur d’Alene back in November. We came off the road of full-time RV ministry and chose North Idaho for our home for many reasons.

First, because God said to move here and attend a specific church. Second, because of Idaho’s reputation of being a conservative, free state. We purchased a newer home that was already an STR because of its location and downtown amenities. We immediately obtained the city required permit. Shortly thereafter, we discovered the council was considering banning STRs going forward.

I have no idea why anyone in the city feels they have the right to determine what I do with my property? This is a year-round vacation area and visitors will still want to come and have the right to choose where they want to stay. Why would I not be allowed to offer my gorgeous, well maintained home to these folks, encourage them to visit the local businesses, and also partake in the many opportunities here?

We discovered the CDA Vacation Rental Alliance group and joined it. I expect many locals do not really know what the city is up to. The alliance has done multiple, quality studies that prove the benefits far out weigh the negatives. Not to mention, if passed to ban or create some sort of absurd lottery, would be in direct violation of my/our property rights and Idaho state law. I have yet to hear one clear argument to support the city. Isn’t it the American Dream for me to be able to offer extraordinary hospitality to our guests visiting this beautiful place?

HEATHER CRAWFORD

Coeur d’Alene