FRAUD: Answer these questions

As a voter in America, I find it difficult to understand why “not enough fraud to change the election results” is not met with the questions, “How much fraud was there and who perpetrated the fraud?”

Is it not a federal and state law that anyone perpetrating fraud in an election should be punished? If the governor of a state caused fraud to have been used in an election, whether or not it was successful, not be prosecuted? Do Republicans and Democrats not have the right to know to what extent there was fraud and who caused it and how it was done? Is that not what the law is for?

If we do not find out who caused the fraud in one election, is not that person or those persons going to do the same thing in a future election, since there appears to be no consequences for such actions?

The federal investigations appear to have found fraud in the federal election, but we only get a summary of not enough to change the results of the election. If a robber goes into a store and only gets a small amount of money, is he not a robber?

We voters deserve more information so we can know what to expect in the next election and why our law enforcers are closing their books on election fraud.

KONRAD LARSON

Hayden