TRUMP: Critics, explain 'monarch'

In two opinion pieces written the other day, DJ Studer and Morton Kraus referred to Trump as a monarch (I’ve heard others use king and dictator as well). I get it that some people don’t like him, but I don’t understand why they use these descriptions.

He’s not been in office a full term and has made no indication he plans on using the military against the U.S. citizenship. Plus, coming up this November we’ll all have the chance to express our choice.

So why these terms? Is it Trump’s handling of the border issue, his use of Executive Orders or the military? When you look at the numbers, facts and data behind all three of these issues, his actions make sense. They’re either based on past president failures, or in line with past presidents’ actions.

So maybe it’s that these people are listening to the Democrats and their sidekick, the mainstream media. Only problem is, both of those groups have demonstrated a negative bias that is easily documented. So hopefully someone can help me understand the use of these terms. If so, please be specific, give some actual evidence instead of the ridiculous generalization thrown out by the Democrats and their propaganda sidekicks. Thanks.

MIKE BUZGA

Coeur d’Alene