PC: A free-speech primer

The formal definition of Political Correctness is, “Conforming to a belief that language and practices which could offend sensibilities (as in race or sex) should be eliminated.”

Sounds reasonable to me, but the term has now come to be associated with insincerity by some and a threat to free speech by others.

Our president has deemed political correctness an anathema which he defies with mean-spirited insolence and indiscriminate accusations. He is entirely within his rights to do this. Nevertheless, I am concerned that his approach to free speech may become the norm for our society.

Sincerity does not require offensive behavior. Honest viewpoints can be expressed in a thoughtful, considerate manner. Consideration for another person’s feelings is not a sin. It takes a little more thought before speech, but kindness and humility are still virtues… I hope.

In a recent Press op/ed, someone suggested that people who are easily offended should be made “brave” by routinely offending them with gradually increasing severity. I hope he was kidding.

I suggest that easily offended souls should be encouraged to recognize, reject and avoid emulating offensive behavior, but at the same time, concentrate on not being personally offended by it. This takes practice, but it preserves inner peace.

I do not condemn, hate or interfere with the president. Judging anyone’s worth is above my theological pay grade. I merely desire that we remain a civil society, capable of honest disagreement without hateful words or behavior.

Is it really a sign of weakness to offer kindness to someone whose opinions differ from ours?

LARRY FREI

Coeur d’Alene