MATHESON: No innuendo here

Steve Matheson was recently criticized in a letter to the editor for “making innuendo assertions lacking follow up substance.” I am not certain what she considers “follow up substance,” but had she done her homework, she would see Steve has provided overwhelming evidence to support his legitimate concerns involving the Treasurer’s office. The supporting evidence listed on Steve Matheson’s website, MathesonForTreasurer.com, is comprehensive if not exhaustive. In his Due Diligence section, Steve describes in detail his concerns while providing substantiating documentation. Given the Treasurer’s office (tax collector) had nearly $150,000,000 under control as of Dec. 31, 2013, I believe it’s important to decipher which candidate is making innuendo assertions with no substance. It certainly doesn’t appear to be Steve Matheson.

TERRY FUNK

Coeur d’Alene