Wednesday, October 28, 2026
43.0°F

ARMED: In defense of guns

| June 15, 2014 9:00 PM

We continually hear the government wants our guns, every country that gave up their guns fell under strict dictatorship and became victims of their government, so why should we think it would be any different here?

Every time a cop shoots someone, we should protest them carrying guns, they all get a paid vacation for shooting someone, called paid administrative leave, they should be put on leave without pay until they are cleared.

When you take into consideration the number of people killed by guns is considerably less than accidental deaths by doctors, they very seldom have to explain their actions to anyone, those odds are 9,000 to 1 in favor of the doctors.

As far as keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, I would be for that. Anyone on mental drugs should be denied guns, but since half of the population is on prescription drugs that could trigger them into a suicidal violent state, so the big question is, were they really mentally ill prior to the drugs prescribed for them, or is it a conspiracy to take the guns from everyone? Look at the fluoride in the water that is hazardous to our health, along with all the chemicals in the food that makes people suicidal. The guns are not the problem, it’s mainly chemical imbalance from prolonged use of drugs.

I had two siblings killed in two separate incidents, and an attempt on my own life by a psycho who stalked me for a year. No cop was available when this psycho ran me off the road at 2 a.m. on my way home from work. With a .357 Magnum he shot at me six times. Why should the 535 members of Congress need to disarm 300 million people, when they can’t do their job in a satisfactory manner?

ART KREBS

Coeur d’Alene