Coeur d'Alene Press Newspaper | CDAPress.com

Local and National News - Kootenai County, Idaho

Cliff's Weather Gems

Posted: Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 - 09:01:22 pm PST
Email this story Printer friendly version
 
Cliff Harris

The next 'Little Ice Age' may have already begun!

The total amount of ice and snow as of mid-December 2008 in the Northern Hemisphere was the most on record since December 1913, almost a century ago.

Coincidentally, that was the last time that we experienced a month like we saw last August with absolutely no sunspot activity. We've only seen sporadic episodes of sunspots in the past several months. The sun has been abnormally quiet overall.

Several top observatories around the world, which have been measuring solar activity for more than 200 years, are predicting that "global temperatures will continue to drop by as much as two or three degrees in the next two decades or so between now and about 2030."

The National Solar Observatory in Tucson, Arizona, has recently predicted that "sunspot activity will all but vanish by 2015."

Since the sun is the principle driver of climate changes, both warmer and cooler cycles, a total lack of sunspots would probably herald a repeat of the Maunder Minimum climate cycle, the name given from 1645 to 1715, when sunspots became exceedingly rare.

This was the onset of the so-called Little Ice Age that didn't end until about 1850. Europe, Asia and North America were hit by numerous bitterly cold and often snowy winters. The Thames River in London completely froze over. So thick was the ice that elephants were able to walk across the river. Winter fairs were regularly held on the Thames.

It's possible, due to the fact that it's been at least 11,500 years since the last period previous to the Little Ice Age with such low sunspot activity, that we could see a major Ice Age develop sometime in the next 20 years. We're overdue, folks, for such a frigid occurrence.

For more details, read "Not By Fire, But By Ice," written by my friend Robert W. Felix, who spoke at our global warming seminar in early March 2007 at the beautiful Coeur d'Alene Resort.

Bob says, "The next big ice age could begin any day! It could happen this next week, next month or next year. It's not the case of if, only when we'll be buried by up to nine stories of snow!

"The climate of Greenland will descend upon Canada, Britain, Norway, much of northern Europe, northern Asia and at least two-thirds of the North American Continent," according to Mr. Felix.

Will Bob be right? Only time will tell.

Bob's book can be purchased by calling (800) 310-1764, Pin No. 9761. His Web address is www.iceagenow.com.

North Idaho long-range outlook and weather review

I'm writing this weather update during the early afternoon hours of a beautiful, but extremely cold, Saturday, the last full day of the snowiest fall season on recorded history in Coeur d'Alene dating back to at least the inception of local weather record-keeping in 1895. It was a bone-chilling 5 degrees above zero at noon. Later, we saw the mercury climb to 7 degrees at 1:30 p.m., but this was still 4 degrees below the previous lowest maximum reading for Dec. 20 of 11 degrees in 1924.

Our autumn of 2008 snowfall total, as of noon on Saturday, stood at an incredible 43.3 inches on Player Drive, which included the all-time record big dump of the white stuff of 37.3 inches, which fell over a record non-stop 52-hour span stretching from 5:30 a.m. Wednesday to 9:30 a.m. Friday.

The previous snowiest fall in recorded history in Coeur d'Alene occurred nearly a century ago in 1922. That particular autumn season gauged 33.3 inches of snow, exactly 10 inches less than the whopping snow total of this fall.

December 1922 also measured 24.4 inches of snow in a 44-hour storm from Dec. 9 through Dec. 11, the second most snowfall in a single non-stop period on record. In third place is the 47-hour snowstorm of Dec. 27 through Dec. 29, 1992. Nearly 21 inches fell in that blizzard. I remember it well. I had to have my roof shoveled off twice during the extremely snowy winter of 1992-93.

Yes, folks, the snowiest month on record remains January 1969 with an almost unbelievable 82.4 inches gauged in town. Near the end of the month, the snow depths in Dalton Gardens, for example, exceeded 5 feet on level ground, more than at anytime during the snowiest winter season ever from end-to-end in 2007-08, which had, from July 1 through June 30, an amazing 172.9 inches.

The top five snowiest winter seasons on record in Coeur d'Alene since 1895 are:

1. 2007-08: 172.9 inches.

2. 1915-16: 124.4 inches.

3. 1968-69: 117.8 inches.

4. 1949-50: 116.6 inches.

5. 1992-93: 113.7 inches.

Will our snowiest autumn on record lead to the snowiest winter season ever across North Idaho? I doubt it.

Remember, I've said for many months now that most of this winter's snow would fall between Dec. 10 and six weeks later on Jan. 21. With another 40 inches or so likely in the next 30 days in town, that would push our seasonal total to near 85 inches by the end of the third week of January. Our normal snowfall for an entire season is 66.7 inches.

If we receive approximately our normal of 35 additional inches of snow between Jan. 21 and June 30, we should end up with nearly 120 inches of the white stuff by June 30. That would put us in third place behind last year and the snowy 1915-16 season and just ahead of 1968-69.

Only time will tell. But at least one thing's for certain. In terms of total snow on the ground this Dec. 25, it will.


Email this story Printer friendly version
POST YOUR OPINION
View all of the latest commented stories!
You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

 

"A good community newspaper is a community in conversation with itself." - Walter Lippmann

The Press invites you to contribute your online comments, with positive statements whenever possible and, when necessary, your constructive, negative thoughts.

Commenting Rules
NEW- You must REGISTER in order to post on this forum. None of the information you provide will be used for anything that could be considered commercial in nature. The Press simply uses this information as a means to identify the poster.
- Do not use the comments area to promote commercial ventures.
- No libel (that means no NAME CALLING, OR USING PRIVATE CITIZEN'S NAMES)
- Use good taste
- Be positive whenever possible
- Do not Spam - post an advertisement or flood forum with the same message.
- Do not type entire post in CAPITALS - it means you are screaming. 
- THINK BEFORE YOUPOST and ask yourself these questions;
Is it a positive remark?
Will I be hurting anyone?
Children can come to this site, is it appropriate for their eyes?
Most importantly, would I want my name on this forum?

namnilrac wrote on Dec 24, 2008 5:13 PM:

" Thanks RLS

A merry christmas to you and to Shadeck also.

namnilrac "

rls wrote on Dec 24, 2008 3:20 PM:

" namnilrac wrote on Dec 24, 2008 11:24 AM:
Was there coal fired plants and automobiles 300 years ago that I didn't know about?
==========================
Yes you missed that and it wasnt 300 years ago it was a million years ago and the cave men had them.
I suppose you never seen the show the Flintstones.
I couldnt help that it was so funny.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. "

rls wrote on Dec 24, 2008 12:53 PM:

" Shadeck wrote on Dec 24, 2008 12:24 PM:

" OK...I quit....But first, Merry Christmas to all..I hope you are correct, and I hope there really is a Santa Clause. I'll let you know in the morning if your fantasy world actually exists....Merry Christmas and have a great New Year! :)
==========================
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year back at you.

I talked to Santa personaly and he told me he would only stop by your place and give you presents if you quit spreading that global warming whoooy...{-: "

Shadeck wrote on Dec 24, 2008 12:24 PM:

" OK...I quit....But first, Merry Christmas to all..I hope you are correct, and I hope there really is a Santa Clause. I'll let you know in the morning if your fantasy world actually exists....Merry Christmas and have a great New Year! :) "

rls wrote on Dec 24, 2008 12:06 PM:

" I am simply right and I am afraid, for your side, science is on mine.
============

To "Shadeck" Then why is it there are more scientists that disagee with global warming than there are that do agree with it and MORE everyday coming out and saying global warming is nothing but a bunch of whoooy..

You are only right in your own mind because you are easily brain washed by the likes of Al Gore and or you think man is as powerful as to be able to change nature...Pretty sad if you think man is more powerful and can change nature however....You might want to think about that Mr. almighty powerful guy. "

Shadeck wrote on Dec 24, 2008 11:52 AM:

" At my age I have to watch my blood pressure so I don't watch CNN. I prefer FOX. Paint me "liberal" if you think that helps camoflauge your lack of substantial science and your reliance on "out of context" soundbytes from competing news networks. If the last election taught us anything it would be the absence of media integrity. I am neither liberal nor conservative...I am simply right and I am afraid, for your side, science is on mine. "

namnilrac wrote on Dec 24, 2008 11:24 AM:

" Shadeck,
You have learned your liberal lessons well. I lived in LV for 8 years and no one needs to tell me about that part of the country. If you would have read the post, it was not LV weathermen...It was Liberal CNN Meteorologists who are realating what we all know....Man can't change the earths weather, it is cyclic and it is the "sun" which is the greater of the climate changing forces, or was there coal fired plants and automobiles 300 years ago that I didn't know about? "

Shadeck wrote on Dec 24, 2008 10:52 AM:

" Las Vegas? Disputing man's influence on climate change? You guys really need to step back and look at the big picture. First of all, Las Vegas and their mega casinos have been importing water, building golf courses, fountains and thousands of acres of lawns since the 60's and have severly altered the climate of that desert town in the process! Anyone, like me, who has spent time in Las
Vegas over the last five decades will tell you and you need only look at their climate history to know that man can seriously affect climate. Between the smog and the moisture being trapped in that valley Las Vegas weather has become its own catastrophe that can only be corrected as Lake Mead and the tourists dry up. Mini ice age? Sure, that's why the State of Florida is pumping money into global ice melt studies as their beaches disappear...Thats why Governor Palin has declared an emergency in Northwestern Alaska, thats why the Siberian tundra is melting and the ocean's Ph levels are changing. But hey, Cliff and some LV weatherman say "alls good".... Say goodnight Gracie! "

rls wrote on Dec 24, 2008 10:15 AM:

" To "namnilrac" You posted well and it came from the most liberal channel of all...Good job.

Even the liberal Loony Toons that were bamboozled by Al Gore are now back peddling and doing everything they can to get out from under this plaque of deceit that Al Gore brought on them. "

namnilrac wrote on Dec 24, 2008 10:04 AM:

" To Shadeck - Here is someone else with a real job....From the LV Review Journal: Unprecedented snow in Las Vegas has some scratching their heads how can there be global warming with this unusual cold and snowy weather?

CNN Meteorologist Chad Myers had never bought into the notion that man can alter the climate and the Vegas snowstorm didnt impact his opinion. Myers, an American Meteorological Society certified meteorologist, explained on CNNs Dec. 18 Lou Dobbs Tonight that the whole idea is arrogant and mankind was in danger of dying from other natural events more so than global warming.

You know, to think that we could affect weather all that much is pretty arrogant, Mother Nature is so big, the world is so big, the oceans are so big I think were going to die from a lack of fresh water or were going to die from ocean acidification before we die from global warming, for sure.

Myers is the second CNN meteorologist to challenge the global warming conventions common in the media. He also said trying to determine patterns occurring in the climate would be difficult based on such a short span.

My career has been 22 years long, Myers said. Thats a good career in TV, but talking about climate its like having a car for three days and saying, This is a great car. Well, yeah it was for three days, but maybe in days five, six and seven it wont be so good.

We have 100 years worth of data, not millions of years that the worlds been around, Myers continued.

Dr. Jay Lehr, an expert on environmental policy, told Lou Dobbs Tonight viewers you can detect subtle patterns over recorded history, but that dates back to the 13th Century. If we go back really, in recorded human history, in the 13th Century, we were probably 7 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than we are now and it was a very prosperous time for mankind, If we go back to the Revolutionary War 300 years ago, it was very, very cold. Weve been warming out of that cold spell from the Revolutionary War period and now were back into a cooling cycle. Lehr indicated the earth is presently entering a cooling cycle a result of nature, not man.

The last 10 years have been quite cool, Lehr continued. And right now, I think were going into cooling rather than warming. But, all we can do is adapt. It is the sun that does it, not man. Lehr is a senior fellow and science director of The Heartland Institute.

Another CNN meteorologist attacked the concept that man is somehow responsible for changes in climate. Rob Marciano charged Al Gores 2006 movie, An Inconvenient Truth, had major inaccuracies. The biggest thing I have a problem with is this implication that Katrina was caused by global warming. global warming does not conclusively cause stronger hurricanes. Want more...1000's of scientists agree. Get smart! "

rls wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:52 AM:

" This SHOWS that glaciers ARE growing and there are MANY MANY more site that prove glaciers ARE GROWING.
ht tp://w ww.iceagenow.c om/Growing_Glaciers.htm

Only the global warming loons that have got themselves in so deep or are still making money off it like Al Gore are the ONLY ones professing global warming still exists any more. "

rls wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:48 AM:

" Bettie wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:39 AM:
" Global warming would be kinda nice right now. "
=====================
Yeah, You got that right but don't hold your breath until the sun flares come back and that isn't suppose to happen fo another 50 years with the way nomal climate change has been recorded including glacieral ice cuttings to determine what NORMAL climate changes will be.

Until then I would prepare for lots more winters like the last two have been and this year is already turning out to be. "

Shadeck wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:47 AM:

" I suggest you find yourself a copy of Tarr and Martin and read up on glaciers. They are not advancing, they are not growing and they have been and continue to be receding. The Bering Glacier has receded so far that it has revieled a prehistoric forest and the BLM has established labratories and study camps in the morains. Villages and cemetaries along the Arctic coast thousands of years old are falling into the sea and emergency measures are underway to cope with what they know will be a contiuation of the porcess. Toss all the shallow insults my way you wish rls...You are wrong and so is Cliff.... "

Bettie wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:39 AM:

" Global warming would be kinda nice right now. "

rls wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:28 AM:

" Shadeck wrote on Dec 24, 2008 8:57 AM:
yes, it is cold in the upper elevations and snow is accumulating but it is not glaciating...and it wont have time to.
========================
My mistake then since I didn't realize you were God and could see into the future even though the glaciers ARE GROWING and have been growing for quite some time ALL over the world.

I sure have to laugh at your post, Just how do you think those glaciers got there if it wasn't for the snow.
Do you think it was ICE falling from the sky?
If the glaciers ARE growing like the URL showed you then they are galciating arn't they.
Which bring us back to the global warming loons that will say anything to cover their tracks when it comes to their lies about global warming. "

Shadeck wrote on Dec 24, 2008 8:57 AM:

" You are taking isolated comments of USGS glaciologists and others out of context and assigning your own interpretations. Glacial "mass" may increase due to additional snowfall but it is shortlived. Actual glacial ice is thousands sometimes tens of thousands of years old and IT IS MELTING....Glaciers advance for a number of reasons not the least of which is that they all have a liquid "river" of silt and water running under them and "greasing" their tracks. As the older ice melts this river becomes more fluid and the glacier advances...yes, it is cold in the upper elevations and snow is accumulating but it is not glaciating...and it wont have time to. "

rls wrote on Dec 24, 2008 8:37 AM:

" To "Shadeck" It appears you are NOT correct with posting that glaciers are not growing when in fact they are growing all over the world and some of them at an alarming rate as this URL will show you.
ht tp://w ww.iceagenow.c om/Growing_Glaciers.htm


Are you one of these types of peopleA Global warming loon.
Ht tp://w ww.kowabunga.o rg/2007/09/global_warming_loons_gone_wild_5.html "

Shadeck wrote on Dec 23, 2008 9:28 PM:

" Good grief Cliff! Stop already, you're killing me! You are probably the only person in the world with a real job who believes this tripe. There is more snow at the real high elevations but the ice is disappearing at an alarming rate. Maybe, just maybe if you combine snow and ice by volume someone can stretch the truth but it will melt away before anyone can test the comment. There is only a handful of glaciers in the world advancing and that is because they have extremely large accumulation areas at high elevations and the increased snow does push...But the increase snow is a result of the increased moisture due to trillions of tons of ice melt! "

rls wrote on Dec 23, 2008 4:26 PM:

" To "namnilrac" you said it very well and right on.

To "Niles" Don't know if you seen it or not but the Obomination and Al Gore were setted side by side at a table when the Obomination said Al Gore was right on and he was going to support Al Gore all the way with his Global Warming "LIES" which relates to a carbon TAX for NO reason at all other than to impose a carbon Tax which will raise gas, oil, and coal prices.. "

Niles wrote on Dec 23, 2008 3:33 PM:

" Ironically Al Gore and the sun are both similar in shape and heat output. The suns heat is from thermonuclear explosive energy and Gores from just plain hot air. Maybe if Gore just stopped talking any human influence on global temperatures would greatly diminish. "

namnilrac wrote on Dec 23, 2008 2:33 PM:

" Yes Cliff, you are right. I cannot possibly repeat this fact enough: GLOBAL WARMING IS FOR MORONS! Man made Global Warming doesnt make much realistic sense. The popular, Gore-driven theory of global warming is junk science and the useful idiots from Hollywood who promote global warming are nothing more than dull tools. Of those people who believe in the popular theory of global warming, they are certainly misinformed laypeople who shouldnt be expected to understand it, anyway.

The people to blame are the Leonardo DiCaprios, Al Gores, Sheryl Crowes, and the assortment of simpletons out there who are promoting this junk science as if it is some sort of religion. There are more and more scientists through the world who are disputing it all and declaring that global warming is completely irrational.

I am really tired of everybody just BELIEVING in the popular notion of global warming. The media is MASSIVELY TO BLAME for reporting on junk science as if it were FACT, and for SHUNNING and DISRESPECTING the opinions of the hundreds of esteemed scientists and climatologists who have publicly questioned the science behind global warming.

People need to wake up. It is not FACT, it is GUESSWORK. So, if you are a die-hard believer in the global warming story as told by the media today, and the elitist dunces in Hollywood, then you have been duped and you should think twice next time before biting on the hook. "

Next Ad