Coeur d'Alene Press Newspaper | CDAPress.com

Local and National News - Kootenai County, Idaho

Ghosts of the Selkirks

Posted: Saturday, Apr 26, 2008 - 07:31:27 pm PDT
Email this story Printer friendly version
By SEAN GARMIRE
Staff writer 
Courtesy Photo
A caribou bull from the Selkirk herd wanders onto a roadway in British Columbia. The relatively docile animals often wander onto roads to lick salt, imperiling the diminutive population.

Idaho Fish and Game biologists try to unravel mystery behind shrinking Mountain Caribou population

The biologist looked through the small airplane window, carefully examining the jagged peaks and snow-covered cliffs of the Selkirk Mountains below.

The pilot sitting next to him pointed across the cockpit and out the window. His static voice sounded through the noise-canceling headphones.

"There's tracks down there."

The biologist held his face to the window, studying the track line carved into the snowy ground.

"Could be caribou," he said. "Let's take another pass."

Even from several hundred feet, the animal's tracks were visible in a long, shadowed line -- broken since the last snow fall the day before. It weaved around a rocky ridge and disappeared into a patch of small, shrub-like trees stunted by wind and cold.

The freezing alpine world below is home to the mountain caribou -- the most endangered large mammal alive in North America.

The airplane, contracted by Panhandle National Forest caribou biologist Tim Layser, banked and made a second pass over the tracks. Then another, and another.

"I don't know, it looks like goat to me," Layser said, making a note on his laptop.

The task seems colossal -- spotting through an airplane window tracks made by any of the 46 remaining caribou of the Selkirk herd in an effort to record their movements across their range. The population is so small an avalanche or unwitting truck driver could nearly wipe them out, and the herd ranges across about 2,000 square miles in two countries.

There are few other large mammals adapted to live this high in the Selkirks, but some moose and other animals wander across the mountain tops, making the job of deciphering tracks from hundreds of feet above an extremely difficult one.

According to Layser, no one knows just how many mountain caribou historically lived in the U.S. But researchers know through the 19th century, herds spanned mountain ranges across the northern tier of the United States, as well as much of Canada. In Idaho, caribou lived as far south as the Salmon River.

In 1950 the Selkirk herd numbered an estimated 100 animals. By the 1980s that number had dropped to 25.

Now, only a few herds live north of the Canadian border, and only one south of it in North Idaho and a sliver of Eastern Washington. Rough estimates indicate there are about 1,200 to 1,400 mountain caribou alive on the planet.

"The perception for most people is: there's a lot of them up in Canada, why should we care about these ones?" Layser said. "Understand, these are mountain caribou; they're different."

Mountain caribou are a type of woodland caribou -- a subspecies that includes two other "ecotypes," said Wayne Wakkinen, IDFG biologist. While there are small genetic differences between woodland caribou and the barren ground caribou that cross northern tundras in staggering numbers, there are only behavioral differences between the ecotypes. The primary difference being the mountain caribou's choice of habitat.

During winter months when deer, moose, elk and other herbivores are driven down slope, the caribou follow to lower elevations. But only for a short time. When mountain snows harden, they return to using the firm snow as a platform to reach strands of lichen that drape across high tree branches that were unreachable before.

In that habitat they are removed from competition over food, and they are guarded against predators.

But that survival strategy has its drawbacks, Wakkinen said.

"Their whole evolutionary behavior has been to live where nothing bothers them, that's why they're up on the top of a mountain," he said. "They're actually pretty docile. If they see people they're not just going to fade into the trees and get away from you. It's actually one of their downfalls."

Wakkinen said declines in Caribou populations likely resulted from destruction of old growth forest through logging, development and wildfire.

WIth habitat changes, as well as an increase in sport hunting through the 19th century, came the restructuring of a variety of species in the Selkirks. Whitetail deer populations grew more numerous, driving up mountain lion populations -- caribou's primary predator.

Game managers say because virtually no data were recorded, the events that led to the caribou's collapse are not fully understood.

"I'm not sure anybody knows the whole answer," Wakkinen said.

More than 20 years ago a series of transplanting efforts were undertaken by IDFG and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Over the course of 11 years, ending in 1998, more than 100 caribou were taken from herds in British Columbia and released with radio collars in the 950,000-acre recovery area.

During a 2008 census, only about five of the original radio collared caribou were located. The rest have "either died, or the batteries are dead," Wakkinen said.

Wakkinen, who unlike Layser uses radio telemetry rather than binoculars to track caribou, said there has been a small but noticeable increase in the population over the past five years. It has risen an average of two to four each year from about 33 in 2003.

"It's a slow increase, and a total population of 46 is tenuous regardless, but at least we're going in the right direction," Wakkinen said. "It's actually somewhat encouraging."

The transplanted population has also received some protection from the courts.

In 2007, a Federal Court issued a ruling that banned snowmobiling within portions of the recovery area. The ruling resulted from concerns that motorized vehicles cutting through caribou habitat were putting added strain on the herds. Recreationalists still ride through closed areas, however.

The Idaho Panhandle National Forest reported it cited three snowmobilers by April in 2008 for riding in restricted areas where three caribou had been seen a month earlier. The violation is punishable by a $5,000 fine, six months in jail or both; however, each rider was given a $125 fine.

Wakkinen said the few members of the Selkirk herd make a population so small that, in the long run, it would not be able to support itself. But animals sometimes move across corridors that link their ranges, occasionally contributing new members, and rescuing the herd from local extinction.

Wakkinen said if resource management decisions continue to be made with caribou in mind, the Selkirk population could grow to around 100. But, because that entails growing more of the caribou's lichen-sustaining old growth forest, any benefits may take as long as 50 years to document.

Although the small population has little affect on the regional ecosystem, Wakkinen said he thinks it is important to work to boost their numbers.

"I think it certainly is an ethical decision," he said. "Those animals existed here before we came, so maybe we can make some management accommodations and keep them on the landscape."


Email this story Printer friendly version
POST YOUR OPINION
View all of the latest commented stories!
You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

 

"A good community newspaper is a community in conversation with itself." - Walter Lippmann

The Press invites you to contribute your online comments, with positive statements whenever possible and, when necessary, your constructive, negative thoughts.

Commenting Rules
NEW- You must REGISTER in order to post on this forum. None of the information you provide will be used for anything that could be considered commercial in nature. The Press simply uses this information as a means to identify the poster.
- Do not use the comments area to promote commercial ventures.
- No libel (that means no NAME CALLING, OR USING PRIVATE CITIZEN'S NAMES)
- Use good taste
- Be positive whenever possible
- Do not Spam - post an advertisement or flood forum with the same message.
- Do not type entire post in CAPITALS - it means you are screaming. 
- THINK BEFORE YOUPOST and ask yourself these questions;
Is it a positive remark?
Will I be hurting anyone?
Children can come to this site, is it appropriate for their eyes?
Most importantly, would I want my name on this forum?

To Simple Math wrote on Jun 6, 2008 3:31 PM:

" You are wrong...wolves average closer to 100 lbs, especially males who can be more like 150 lbs. Caribou are the average size of a large mule deer or small elk - which usually average closer to the 250 - 400 lb range. So redo your figures, but I do understand your logic. "

sean garmire wrote on Jun 6, 2008 11:44 AM:

" To Mike: I think when Wayne said caribou were here "long before we got here," he meant we europeans. "

X wrote on May 2, 2008 9:56 PM:

" Is it true the chinese pay thousands of dollars for wolf 'mt. oysters'? It's supposed to make them virile, or something... "

hey Math wrote on May 2, 2008 3:54 PM:

" I think you must be more simple than the math is - 50 lb wolf time 7 in a pack is 350-lbs, not 740 you dork.

No wonder the country is going to hell in a hand-basket. It also explains the mental level of the anti-wolf crowd. "

Simple Math wrote on May 2, 2008 2:44 PM:

" 50lb wolf times 7(in a pack) equals 750lbs of pure, hungry predator.

Seems only logical that a 200lb caribou (or deer, moose, dog, cow, sheep, person, etc.) wouldn't stand a chance...but I could be wrong.

Or we could just nominate 'boxers' to take a nice long trip into the North Idaho wildlife and see how long he lasts...he/she could be the first step in taking care of the human population problem that he/she complains about. "

To local wrote on May 2, 2008 2:18 PM:

" I have seen a Caribou in the Pack River area and it was cool, They are about as ugly as a moose compared to the tundra Caribou but it was a treat to see one.
I am TOTALLY on board with you when it comes to LOCKING up OUR mountains.
Just to let everyone know I was on my 4X4 ATV when I saw it and got with in 50 feet of it and it it didn't even care if I was there...So leave OUR mountains ALONE since it is just another excuse for the F&G to LOCK them up. "

local wrote on May 2, 2008 12:56 PM:

" I grew up in the Selkirk country...i have spent many summers in the Long Canyon/Smith Creek/Boundry Creek drainages...my family still runs cattle in the high country up there....In the 47 years of hunting,camping,backpacking,etc. I have never seen so much as even a sign of a Caribou...Cougars, grizzly bears, mountain goats even a Grey wolf before they were re introduced here...these animals (Caribou) live in Canada and once in awhile cross over into our country..thus they are illegal immigrants and should be deported back to Canada and not be allowed citizenship!! they are not natives so we should leave them alone...STOP LoCKING UP OUR MOUNTAINS !! They will just become part of the food chain for the bears...cougars ..and yes humans...I am sure they taste better than Mule deer.. "

Mike wrote on May 1, 2008 5:46 PM:

" It is perhaps a LITTLE known fact that caribou are Eurasian animals that migrated over the Bering land bridge at the end of the Wisconsin glaciation, same time as human beings did. Therefore, Wayne Wakkinen's statement that "Those animals existed here before we came," is factually incorrect. Ethically, his job is to manage wildlife using science, not to jerk people around with bogus a-scientific pronouncements. "

Gawd wrote on Apr 28, 2008 3:44 PM:

" Time to save more wolves ! "

dj wrote on Apr 28, 2008 12:19 PM:

" good for your rabbit rabbit rabbit -- say idabillie -- are you sure the taste is better then open range caribou? // those high country critters only eat pine cones, alpine fir and moss, i suspect? "

Harly age twelve Hayden wrote on Apr 28, 2008 1:38 AM:

" Can we put salt licks out? I am serious is it possible? hang some in the area trees. My Rabbit has one. "

Harly age eight Hayden wrote on Apr 28, 2008 1:37 AM:

" Can we put salt licks out? I am serious is it possible? hang some in the area trees. My Rabbit has one. "

Harly age Hayden wrote on Apr 28, 2008 1:36 AM:

" Can we put salt licks out? I am serious is it possible? hang some in the area trees. My Rabbit has one. "

LJ wrote on Apr 27, 2008 9:24 PM:

" Well if Americans keep taking all this so lightly maybe one day we can just do away with wildlife altogether and not have to be bothered by saving them. Seems to be the way of man anyway.
"

Bob Fanning wrote on Apr 27, 2008 11:00 AM:

" http://www.mountaincaribou.org/ protection rackets just like Al Capone

Sorry this is the new spotted owl.

The recovery plan commits an ever more intrusive government to:

Protect substantial amounts of currently unprotected habitat, which is of course central to recovery success. Where identified by herd experts the new protection will include low elevation habitat.
Manage the rapidly expanding human recreational footprint in caribou habitat.
Manage predator populations only where they are preventing recovery of mountain caribou. Elevated predation rates are explicitly recognized as a secondary effect of habitat loss and fragmentation; the plan requires that predation management be supported by publicly reviewed scientific rationales.
Augment smaller herds (between 10 and 50 animals). read ;...lots and lots of places , like YOUR back yard.

"

Bob Fanning wrote on Apr 27, 2008 10:59 AM:

" http://www.mountaincaribou.org/ protection rackets just like Al Capone

Sorry this is the new spotted owl.

The recovery plan commits an ever more intrusive government to:

Protect substantial amounts of currently unprotected habitat, which is of course central to recovery success. Where identified by herd experts the new protection will include low elevation habitat.
Manage the rapidly expanding human recreational footprint in caribou habitat.
Manage predator populations only where they are preventing recovery of mountain caribou. Elevated predation rates are explicitly recognized as a secondary effect of habitat loss and fragmentation; the plan requires that predation management be supported by publicly reviewed scientific rationales.
Augment smaller herds (between 10 and 50 animals). read ;...lots and lots of places , like Renee Walters back yard.

"

Mike wrote on Apr 27, 2008 10:40 AM:

" It is a well-known fact that herbivore population change is driven by predator-prey relations, especially small populations that are not food-limited. Well-known fact. Not a mystery. Proven again and again. Wildlife science. The common metric used is reared young per 100 adult females per year. Whatever limits that metric limits the population, and it is always predators. "

boxers wrote on Apr 27, 2008 9:40 AM:

" looks like road kill not snowmobiles. maybe we should curb the use of salt on the roadway or shut down the roadway completely. three words describe the problem, people,people,people= less wildlife. it seems like its really easy to accuse some activity one is not interested in as the problem but in reality the global problem is too damn many people! "

TJ wrote on Apr 27, 2008 9:19 AM:

" If the first snowmobiler had received the maximum penalty I suspect there would have been no further violations. Give 'em the max, what's the use of having a law if it's not enforced? "

sjs wrote on Apr 27, 2008 8:33 AM:

" DUH! Take wolves out of the equation and watch the herd grow! (and don't try to tell us there aren't any wolves in the area!) "

Idabillie wrote on Apr 27, 2008 8:25 AM:

" I love Selkirk Caribou, they taste so much better on the BBQ than Barren Ground Caribou. "

jkm wrote on Apr 27, 2008 7:57 AM:

" This is just another example of the arrogance of some people. Leave the damn things alone and they'll survive a lot longer. Since 'men' have started to manage these few critters so as to increase the size of their group to a number that 'they' believe it should be, the US taxpayer has spent tens of millions of dollars importing and tracking them to death. Ask Wayne W. how many caribou have died due to the trauma of transport from Canada or how many died when the tracking collar they wore got so encrusted with ice that they starved because they couldn't lift their head. LEAVE THEM ALONE!! While you're at it as WW why the elk and deer herds aren't up in the 'old growth' forests - NO FOOD. "

ah wrote on Apr 27, 2008 7:14 AM:

" It took just a few moments for the rabid anti-wolf people to come out of the wood work. I expect no less from that pointy-headed breed. "

bbbailey wrote on Apr 27, 2008 6:55 AM:

" WOLVES.....WOLVES.....WOLVES !!!!!! "

JB wrote on Apr 27, 2008 6:48 AM:

" Wolves... next question please. However if you asked al gore... he would say global warming is the cause. "

ROCKET SCIENTIST wrote on Apr 27, 2008 6:14 AM:

" Shrinking Mountain Caribou population? No chit! That's what happens when you have uncontrolled growth! "

Next Ad